Thames Farm (again)

As expected the bonkers continues.....
http://www.southoxon.gov.uk/ccm/planning/ApplicationDetails.jsp?REF=P16/S0970/O

Posted by: Rupert Thurgood | 24/01/2017 4:49 pm

Yes David Parr, luckily that did not go unnoticed by the Henley Standard or the committee ....its been thrown out so often now, the whole thing is a farce to be honest.

It remains to be seen just how far 'farce' can get you though...and money talks eventually.

Posted by: Rupert Thurgood | 25/01/2017 4:39 pm

Looking at the list of comments from those in favour of the development, there appear to be a lot
typed "standard" letters with varying styles of hand printed signatures.
Given previous tactics am I right to be concerned?
David

Posted by: David Parr | 25/01/2017 3:47 pm